The U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation designed to force President Donald Trump to end the Iran War, in a vote that was largely by party lines. The House voted 215 to 208 in favor of the war powers resolution, which will send the resolution to the Senate.
The move marks a victory for House Democrats and constitutional purists who point out that, under the War Powers Act of 1973, the current conflict is illegal without explicit congressional approval because it has lasted longer than 90 days. Four Republican legislators voted with the Democrats.
The War Powers Act of 1973 is a federal law designed to limit a U.S. president’s ability to initiate or escalate military actions abroad without congressional approval. Passed over President Richard Nixon’s veto, it reasserted Congress’ authority under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to declare war.
An agreement that would comprise an initial framework, paving the way for more substantive negotiations, is being discussed by Iran and the United States, sources close to the negotiators have said. Such an agreement would include a declaration of the end of war on all fronts, including Lebanon, for the duration of the negotiations.
Iran fired drones at a passenger terminal at Kuwait’s main airport Wednesday, killing one person and wounding dozens more. The bombardment resulted in a brief closure of the airfield. The strike made it clear to residents and travelers alike in the Persian Gulf that no country was immune from attack.
A recent interview in the Austrian daily Die Presse has renewed debate over whether Vladimir Putin’s immunity can ultimately be pierced under international law. Legal scholars argued that while a sitting head of state continues to enjoy broad protections before the domestic courts of other nations, such immunity is increasingly viewed as procedural rather than absolute.
Related: Cunard Unveils Major Overhaul of Queen Victoria
Ukrainian human rights lawyer Oleksandra Matviichuk explicitly pointed out that Russia deliberately uses war crimes as an intentional strategy to break local civilian resistance and occupy Ukraine. The International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Mr. Putin has further highlighted the growing tension between traditional doctrines of sovereign immunity and modern efforts to impose personal criminal accountability on national leaders.
The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation announced that it had, working with the Department of Justice, Facebook parent Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Coinbase, coordinated a massive joint operation to dismantle multiple so-called “pig butchering” scam syndicates in Southeast Asia. They collaborated with the Royal Thai Police, who successfully arrested 63 individuals associated with the scam compound.
A California lawsuit alleges that Meta Platforms profited from Facebook and Instagram ads promoting scams in violation of California’s false advertising and unfair business practices laws. The lawsuit was filed on Monday in Santa Clara county superior court on behalf of all California residents. It accuses Meta of tolerating fraudulent advertising on a global basis, citing leaked internal documents that state the company earned significant revenue from scam adverts that bear unmistakable hallmarks of fraud.
The suit seeks restitution, civil damages, and an order prohibiting Meta from engaging in unfair business practices, as the company faces scrutiny over its handling of scam ads. According to the filing, the company’s actions have led to financial losses for many individuals, and it is now facing a lawsuit that could have significant implications for its business practices.
As world leaders handle complex geopolitical situations, they must also contend with the challenges of international law and the growing threat of scams and cybercrime. The recent lawsuit against Meta Platforms highlights the need for companies to take responsibility for their actions and to prioritize the safety and security of their users.